Part 1
What you use
The apps and services you actually get paid through. For each one: how likely it is to lock your money, how long the money can be taken back, and where it sits in the meantime. This is the part you came for.
PLACEHOLDER 1:1 · flash, low angle
51 % of all losses:
PayPal is where the money goes missing
More than 600 people in the adult industry were asked which service cost them a bank account or a payment app. Half of them — 51 % — said PayPal. That is more than twice as many as the next service on the list. And PayPal can sit on your money for 180 days or longer. Its own rules do not promise you get it back on day 180: they say “without limitation, for more than 180 days”. So 180 days is the start of the wait, not the end of it.
Free Speech Coalition / SexWorkCEO, “Financial Discrimination and the Adult Industry”, May 2023 — 600+ respondents, 73 % US. PayPal ToS 10.2.2. Checked
Which service cost people their account
Four services cause almost all of it
- 51 %PayPal
- 23 %Stripe
- 16 %Cash App
- 15 %Venmo
- 11 %Chase Bank
FSC, n > 600. People could name more than one service, so the numbers add up to more than 100. Checked
63 % lost access:
Losing the account is the normal thing that happens, not bad luck
63% lost a bank account or a payment app
Nearly two in three lost one. And 64 % of the people asked had no other real income — so when it happens, it hits the rent, not a bit of pocket money.
FSC, May 2023. Checked
14.6 % got money:
Complaining is worth a try. It is not a fix.
14.6% of complaints ended with money back
A US government office takes complaints about payment companies. 41,827 of them were about PayPal. 6,121 — about one in seven — ended with money back. Another one in five got something else, like the account being reopened. So roughly one complaint in three gets you something, and two in three get you nothing. The most common complaint of all, 3,740 times, is simply not being able to get at your own money.
CFPB complaint database, own API query, 13.09.2026. These are all PayPal users, not only this industry — the office does not record what people do for a living. Checked
PLACEHOLDER 16:9 · asphalt, 35 mm
F&F raises the risk:
The tip everyone passes on makes it worse
The tip is: get paid through “Friends & Family” instead of “Goods & Services”. The idea is that the buyer then cannot go to his bank and take the money back. That part is true. But you are also breaking PayPal’s rules, because this is a sale, not a gift to a friend. That makes it more likely PayPal locks your money. And if it does, you have no claim on it: you cannot complain about losing the money without admitting you broke the rules to get it.
PayPal acceptable use policy and commercial-payment terms, read in full. We found no source that measures how much bigger the risk gets. That it gets bigger is documented; by how much is not. Checked
Why breaking the rules is the danger
Once you break the rules, someone can hold it over you
If a buyer knows you are using a payment app against its rules, he can threaten to report you. You cannot defend yourself without admitting you broke them. The same studies record buyers going to their bank and taking money back on purpose, as a threat — along with publishing a seller’s real name and telling her bank what she does.
FSC, May 2023; Hacking//Hustling, “Erased”, 2020. Here, taking money back is a weapon in a buyer’s hands, not just a risk the payment company worries about. Checked
The thing nobody sees coming
The little note on a payment has closed accounts
Every payment app has a box where the sender types what the money is for. Real cases: a buyer typed the seller’s work e-mail address in that box — account closed, $500 gone for good. Another PayPal case, $400, never seen again. Elsewhere the reason given was notes like “nudes”.
Hacking//Hustling, “Erased”, 2020 — 98 online and 38 street-based respondents. The rule: nothing in that box that says what was sold, and never your work e-mail address on a payment. Checked
207,984,218:
On Venmo everyone can see your payments unless you change the setting
Venmo shows payments publicly unless you turn that off. One researcher simply downloaded 207,984,218 payments from a public web address. Researchers then read 389 million of those little notes and found 41 million — one in ten — giving away something private. Nearly four users in ten had done it at least once. Their advice: set everything to private, including your friends list. Who you pay and who pays you identifies you, even with no names attached.
Hang Do Thi Duc; USC/ISI, “I Know What You Did on Venmo”, PETS, 20.04.2022. Checked
Sending money person to person
Money you send is gone, money you get can still be taken away
Two scams that come up again and again. One: the buyer sends you a screenshot that looks like a payment and asks you to send some of it back. The words on those screenshots — “pending”, “processing”, “awaiting confirmation” — do not exist on real payments between people. Two: the payment is real but comes from a stolen bank account. When the real owner notices, the money is pulled back, and you have posted the parcel and paid him.
Generic consumer-protection documentation; University of Minnesota IT Security on fake receipts. Apps like these give you none of the protection a card gives a buyer. Believe your own balance, never a screenshot. Checked
What this page does not claim
Four services people use that we could not check
- ZelleWe never got hold of its rules — the pages would not open for us. Money can be pulled back the same way as described above; whether Zelle has its own rule about adult sales, we do not know.
- VenmoThe 15 % share and the “everyone can see it” finding are solid. But we never got Venmo’s own rulebook, so we say nothing about what it allows.
- RevolutCould not get the rules. So we make no claim.
- WiseLeft out on purpose. Our research tool cut the rule short and, once, made up a clean-sounding version that did not exist. Wise appears on this page only where a site itself says it pays out that way.
We also have nothing solid on crypto or gift cards as ways to get paid. What is well documented about gift cards is the opposite: they are what scammers ask for. If a buyer wants to pay you in gift cards, that is a warning sign, not a payment method.
Own source review, 13.09.2026. Saying “we don’t know” is worth more than borrowing someone else’s number. Gap
Wishlists
Hosting no photos or videos does not keep you safe
A wishlist site lets buyers pay for things on your list. WishTender was built the way that is supposed to be safest: just wishlists, no photos or videos on its own servers. Stripe cut it off anyway in February 2024, about two weeks after “fetish services” appeared on Stripe’s banned list. Stripe’s contract does not only cover what you host. It covers who you do business with and who you help earn money.
Stripe Services Agreement §1.2(a)(ix); WishTender precedent, Feb 2024. Checked
Being linked to your other account
A harmless shop does not help if it points at your adult profile
People get cut off while selling nothing but T-shirts, memberships or tips. The payment company does not judge the single product. It looks at the whole picture — your name, the accounts you link to, who follows you.
Keeping the shop separate from the persona protects you less than it looks like it does. Checked
PLACEHOLDER 16:9 · sodium, chrome
Pantydeal, own FAQ:
The site points you at exactly the services that ban you
Pantydeal says it straight out: “We are not involved in any transactions between users.” Then it lists what members normally use — “PayPal, Amazon gift card, Cash App, and Venmo”. All three of those payment services forbid adult sales in their own rules, and PayPal is the one behind half of all lost accounts. The site collects your monthly fee and takes no risk at all. The locked account and the lost money are yours alone.
Pantydeal FAQ, verbatim; All Things Worn identical (“does not get involved in the sale of items”). The most dangerous setup of all the ones we compared. Checked
Refutations
What people say / what is true
The two things most often repeated about getting paid. Both are wrong in the direction that costs you money.
What people say
PayPal bans worn underwear by name
What is true
It never names it. PayPal simply decides case by case — and inside the US, posting real items is actually allowed
PayPal acceptable use policy, read in full. The rule only says “certain sexually oriented materials or services” are not allowed, and there is no form you can fill in to ask permission. Photos and videos are banned everywhere. Physical items you post are allowed in the US only — in the EU there is no version of this that is allowed. The real danger is the 180-day hold, not a ban with your product’s name on it. Checked
What people say
In adult, one sale in eight gets clawed back through the buyer’s bank
Nobody can say where that 12.5 % comes from — and the number cannot be true
Own verification. It comes from a payment company’s marketing blog. If one sale in eight really were clawed back, every adult seller would be permanently far over the limit the card companies allow, and none of them could take cards at all. The real documented figures: 1.8 % for photos and videos, about 0.5 % for items you post. We do not use the 12.5 %. Do not use
Part 2
What the sites pay out
How each site pays you, how much you need before it pays at all, how long it sits on the money, and which tax forms it wants. Where we could not find a number, it says so — those are gaps in what is published, not things we left out.
Sites · your cut, the name on the bank statement, how you get paid
Only one site handles posted items and digital files through the same payment system
- FeetFinderYou keep 85–90 % — “our fee is 10% (for premium users) or 15% (for basic users)”. The biggest cut for you of any site here. Posted items are covered by a separate set of seller rules. Paid weekly into your bank. The buyer’s statement shows SEGPAY.COM*FeetFinder, so it half gives you away. But it holds your money for 30 days before paying. Its own home page claims “No 30-day holds” — the rules you actually signed say otherwise, and those are what count.
- OnlyFansYou keep 80 %. The buyer’s statement says exactly what it is: “a payment was made to ‘OnlyFans’, ‘OF’ or ‘OnlyFans.com’”. Posting real items is effectively not possible. How much you need before they pay, and how long they hold it: not published.
- Clips4SaleYou keep 60 % on videos, 80 % on tips — the smallest cut here. What you get for it is the best payout: straight to a euro bank account, no fee. And the buyer’s statement gives nothing away: www.TropSunProd.com.
- SnifffrThe only one that actually holds the buyer’s money for you: “Tokens are held by Snifffr until the order is completed.” Then it pays out “through Wise”. You still do the posting yourself. The only worn-underwear site where the money is protected.
- FanslyPays to a euro bank account, to Paxum, or by international transfer. Your cut: not published. EU sellers must hand in two tax forms, and “payouts can only be sent to accounts that match the name on your creator application” — so the bank account has to be in your real name.
- Pantydeal ·
All Things WornThey do not handle money at all. They are just noticeboards. Every risk is yours. Do not count on them to get you paid — see part 1.
Platform terms and payout documentation, read in full. Not published means no official document of theirs states it. The two tax forms are DAC7 and W-8BEN. Checked
Taking card payments yourself
All of them keep some of your money back, and none says how much
- EpochTakes 13.25–15 %, plus $1,950 a year whatever you sell. Keeps nothing back — “We do not require a security deposit nor do we withhold a reserve.” One-person businesses are welcome.
- CCBillPays weekly, $10 per transfer, $50 minimum. Keeps money back for at least six months and will not say how much. Photos and videos fine — worn underwear banned outright.
- SegPayTakes 15.35 % plus 25 cents a sale. Keeps back up to 5 % for six months, gives it back from month seven, then pays weekly on Tuesdays, once you have 125.
- VerotelAdvertises 15.5 %, but in practice 19.5 % once you have regular subscribers and buyers going to their banks. Keeps back 10 % of everything for 26 weeks. €500 a year.
- PaxumCannot take card payments for you. It is only a wallet: sites can pay money into it, a buyer’s card cannot. Private accounts “cannot receive funds from other people”. If it closes your account, it may sit on the money for 180 days.
Merchant agreements and published fee schedules. The yearly fees are what hurt if you sell little: at €1,000 a month, Epoch’s $1,950 a year eats roughly another 16 % on its own. Checked
> 66 % never paid:
You do not lose the money by earning too little. You lose it by never reaching the minimum.
$4.08million stuck on one site in two weeks, at the very most
Most sites pay you nothing until your balance passes a set amount. On the one site in this market that has been counted properly, more than two thirds of 123,674 people never got past the $50 mark. That is 81,625 people, each sitting on less than $50 they could not get out. They had earned the money. They just could not reach it.
0.66 × 123,674 = 81,625 (people)
81,625 × $50 = $4.08 m (hard max)
Jokubauskaitė & Peeters, New Media & Society 28(6), 2026 — complete census, 123,674 performers, 956,662 sessions. Full citation, reference 1. The $4.08 m is the absolute most it could be: the counted number of people times the published $50 limit. Nobody held more than $50, so nobody held exactly $50 either — the real total is lower. Our own guess is $1 m to $2 m, and that part is a guess. Checked Our maths
$400, not $20,000:
Getting no tax form does not mean you owe no tax — the real line is 50 times lower
In the US you owe tax as soon as you have $400 left over after costs, and you have to file a return. But the site only has to send you a form once you pass $20,000 and 200 separate sales in a year. So most small sellers get no form at all — and many then think the money is tax-free. It is not. The tax is owed whether a form arrives or not. You write the income on your return yourself.
- The other formA different form, for work paid directly to you, now starts at $2,000 instead of $600.
- Paying in instalmentsIf you expect to owe more than $1,000, the US wants it four times a year, not once: 15 Apr · 15 Jun · 15 Sep · 15 Jan 2027. You can skip the last one if you file and pay everything by 1 Feb 2027.
- Sellers in the EUFansly wants two tax forms before it pays you. No tax is taken off for you. Once you have shown ID and signed those forms, the tax office can be told who you are.
- UK · CanadaIn the UK you can earn £1,000 before you have to declare anything, rising to £3,000 from 2027/28. In Canada it counts as self-employment, and from CAD 30,000 you must register for sales tax.
IRS; One Big Beautiful Bill Act, July 2025; platform tax documentation. The most expensive thing people get wrong on this page. The US forms are Schedule C and Schedule SE, the site’s form is the 1099-K, the direct-payment one is the 1099-NEC/MISC, the EU forms are DAC7 and W-8BEN, and the Canadian one is the T2125. Checked
Cross-reference
What is left of the price
How you get paid is not a small detail next to what you earn. At the prices people charge here, it decides what you earn. The full sums are in “What pays best”.
What is left after costs · on a $75 sale
Of $75, you keep between $18 and $30
$75.00 − $30.00 − $16.93 = $28.07
$28.07 − 35 % = $18.25 (24.3 %)
$75.00 − $11.25 − $16.93 = $46.82
$46.82 − 35 % = $30.43 (40.6 %)
Each item costs you $16.93: $6.93 postage (Commercial rate) + $10.00 for the underwear; 35 % tax. The top row is a site that takes 40 %, the bottom row one that takes 15 %. A published figure says “about $20 of $75”. We get $18.25, and the $1.75 gap is just the postage price — which is what tells us the method is right. The 35 % tax is our own assumption, not a documented figure. Checked Our maths
The price where you stop losing money
If the site takes 40 %, anything under $28.22 with tracking costs you money
$6.93 + $10.00 = $16.93
$16.93 ÷ 0.85 = $19.92 (15 %)
$16.93 ÷ 0.60 = $28.22 (40 %)
Underwear worn for 24 hours normally sells for $25 to $35. If the site takes 40 %, everything from $25 up to $28.22 loses you money — you pay to make the sale. If it takes 15 %, every price in that range pays. So “I’ll start cheap to get going” puts you in the one stretch of prices that cannot work. The reason is not competition. It is that posting the parcel costs the same $6.93 no matter how little you charge.
USPS Notice 123, Commercial rates, effective 12.07.2026 — $6.93, uniform below 1 lb. $6.93 is the price you pay when you buy postage online through Click-N-Ship. At the post office counter the same parcel costs $7.90. We use the online price because that is what a private seller pays. Checked
Part 3 · Background
Why it all works this way
No law did this. Two card companies did, through the contracts they make everyone else sign. Only about one reader in twenty wants this part, and almost every link to this site points at it — so it sits down here, out of the way of the part you need.
Visa Core Rules 5.8.4.6 · MCC 5967 · itch.io, 24.07.2025
Visa and Mastercard make the rules here. No government does.
Every business that takes cards gets a four-digit number saying what it sells. Adult businesses get the number for “Adult Content and Services”, and that one number decides everything that follows: you must register, you pay the highest fees — and you lose the protection other shops have when a payment turns out to be fraud. Visa’s own rulebook says it plainly: a shop with that number is “not eligible for Dispute protection from Dispute Condition 10.4: Other Fraud – Card-Absent Environment”.
In plain words: when a stolen card is used at a normal shop, the shop is covered even if the buyer’s bank pulls the money back. An adult shop is not covered — not even if the buyer typed a code from his banking app to confirm the payment. Those clawbacks then count against you, and once you pass Visa’s limit the punishments start. Picking a different number to hide what you sell is no escape: that is lying about your business, and the rules let them shut you down and put you on a blacklist for it.
“We have limited ability to ‘push back.’”
itch.io about itself, July 2025
The rest of what they said: “Itch.io is a small company, both in team size and in transaction volume, compared to a company like Steam.” And: “If we lose our ability to accept payments from a partner like PayPal or Stripe, we impact the ability of all creators to do business.” A real company making millions says it can barely argue back. On your own, you have nothing to argue with at all.
Visa Core Rules, edition 18.04.2026, Rule 5.8.4.6 and MCC 5967; itch.io update on NSFW content, 24.07.2025. The code from the banking app is called 3-D Secure. Full citations, references 3 and 7. Checked
The five documents behind the rule
Visa’s own rule on why one person alone cannot get a card account
Straight from Visa’s rulebook, edition 18.04.2026. Before a bank may pass on payments for a business Visa treats as high risk, that bank has to hand in a special application and be approved by Visa, be in good standing in all of Visa’s risk programmes, and if Visa asks, pass an inspection of its offices and systems.
Notice who does all that: the bank, not you. There is no form you can fill in. You can only be signed up by a bank that already runs this whole machine — and no bank sets that up for one person selling a few parcels a month.
That is the real, documented reason. Not that anyone finds you distasteful. It is the paperwork.
The blacklist that follows you personally for five years
The card companies keep a blacklist. If a payment company drops you, you personally go on it — your name, your address, your phone number, your tax number — for five years. Mastercard has one, Visa has its own, also five years, and there is no appeal. Every bank in the world that handles card payments has to check that list before taking on a new business, and has to report the ones it drops.
Closing the account yourself first does not save you — you can still be reported months later. Only the bank that reported you can remove the entry, and only if it was a mistake. Stripe says outright: “Stripe doesn’t disclose MATCH database information to users.” So you are not told.
You do not have to have done anything dishonest. There are plain numeric triggers: more than 1 % of your sales clawed back and $5,000 of them; or fraud on 8 % of sales, at least 10 sales, $5,000; or at Visa, 1,000 disputes and 1.8 %.
This is worse than having your money locked, and people worry about it far less. A locked account costs you one balance. This list costs you five years of being able to take card payments at all — including for a completely different, perfectly ordinary business later. To ask about your own entry: matchbusinessowner@mastercard.com. Visa will not talk to you directly at all.
Part of the rulebook is secret — you cannot read it before you sign
The rules that actually apply to adult sellers sit in three documents. Visa’s high-risk handbook, section 3.1.1: not public. Visa’s handbook on fraud limits: not public. And a Mastercard notice to banks: the page is simply gone, mastercard.com refuses to serve it.
So you agree to rules you are not allowed to read first. You find out what they say only when your bank tells you, in its own words.
That is not us failing to find them. That is the point.
What is documented is the cost. Visa puts adult in its highest risk band. Signing up costs $950 to start, and again for every bank you use. On top of every single sale Visa adds 10 cents plus a tenth of a percent. And the limit before punishment starts is 2.20 % for you, 0.50 % for your bank. What Mastercard charges: we could not find out. Figures get passed around, but we could not match them to any document, so we do not repeat them.
The clause that means staying legal does not help you
Valve said this exact rule was why it pulled games off Steam. It bans any payment that is illegal — or that, purely as Mastercard sees it, might embarrass Mastercard or make its name look bad.
“Purely as Mastercard sees it.” No standard, no definition, nothing to measure it against. Doing everything legally does not protect you.
And Mastercard demands more than the law does. The US has a law requiring anyone publishing explicit material to keep ID and consent records for every person shown. Mastercard goes further. From a civil-rights group’s complaint to the US trade regulator, 30.08.2023: sites “must review all content uploaded by adult content creators for compliance before publication”; banks “must provide Mastercard with log-in access to the platform upon request”; sites “must also submit a monthly report to Mastercard”. All of this “far exceed[s] what is already required by laws such as §2257”.
And if they get it wrong about you, the same complaint says Mastercard “has not detailed whether any appeal procedures are in place or anticipated […] meaning those adult content creators that become victims of inadequate monitoring mechanisms potentially have no recourse.”
Two things people widely believe, both wrong: there is no “seven working days to appeal” at Mastercard — we could not find it anywhere. There is a real seven-day deadline in Visa’s rules, but it is a bank’s duty to tell Visa something, which is a completely different matter. And nobody can show that Mastercard has an appeals process at all; the complaint above says the opposite.
It has happened four times already — and the denials are beside the point
What is on the record. 10.12.2020: Mastercard and Visa stop working with Pornhub. Four days later Pornhub deletes every video by an unverified user — 13 million videos down to 4 million, about seven in ten gone. 19.08.2021: OnlyFans announces it will ban adult content, and its boss blames banks rather than the card companies — one of them, BNY Mellon, was turning down “every transaction”. Six days later OnlyFans takes it back. 24.07.2025: itch.io hides every adult page, about 2 million of them, after a campaign aimed at its payment companies, and stops paying creators: “We have suspended the ability to pay with Stripe for 18+ content for the foreseeable future.”
Steam simply copied the card companies’ wishes into its own contract, as new rule 15: “Content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam’s payment processors and related card networks and banks”. The people it hits cannot read that standard and cannot appeal it.
What set all this off was a court case. In Fleites v. MindGeek, July 2022, a US court refused to let Visa out of a lawsuit. Once a court accepted that a company could be on the hook just for processing the payments, the card companies started pushing that risk downhill — onto banks, then onto websites, and finally onto the person selling. The case is often dated to 2023; the documents say July 2022.
Visa says: “If a transaction is legal, our policy is to process the transaction. We do not make moral judgments.” Mastercard said it had nothing to do with the Steam removals, and Valve said it was Mastercard’s rule 5.12.7. Both can be telling the truth. Nobody has to give an order. The rule exists, and what happens if you fall foul of it — losing your account, five years on the blacklist — is bad enough that everyone obeys in advance, unasked.
Primary documents: Visa Core Rules 1.9.5.1 (VARS review) and 1.9.2.2; Mastercard MATCH / Terminated Merchant File and Visa VMSS; VIRP Guide 3.1.1, VAMP Guide, Mastercard AN 5196; Mastercard Rules 5.12.7 and § 2257; ACLU to the FTC, 30.08.2023; Fleites v. MindGeek, C.D. Cal., 29./31.07.2022. This is the part other people quote, so the wording is kept exactly as written. Checked
What follows
So what should you actually do
Out of the background and into the one decision it leaves you.
Stripe: “fetish services”:
Stop looking for a payment company that will take you
There isn’t one. Every normal option has already said no in writing: PayPal forbids it, Stripe names “fetish services” outright, Square and Cash App rule out “adult entertainment oriented products or services (in any medium)”, Adyen bans “fetish products”, and so do Mollie and Gumroad. And if you did get to take cards yourself, the whole burden would land on you: ID and written consent on file for every person shown, a human checking everything before it goes up, complaints answered within seven working days.
So for one person, the answer is not “who will take my payments”. It is letting an established adult site take the payments in its name instead of yours. You hand over a slice of the money. What you get back is everything this part of the page just described: no contract of your own with Visa or Mastercard, no card account of your own to lose, and no personal liability when a buyer goes to his bank.
Provider terms as at 13.05.2026 and 30.07.2026, read in full. One thing people get wrong: OnlyFans is often called your “payment agent”, and §22.5 of its terms specifically says it is not acting for you. The protection is real anyway — the terms just do not describe it that way. Checked
Five ways in
Where this connects
Every kind of selling shows up on every one of these pages — as a line in a table, never as a page of its own.
What pays best
What pays best
What pays best for my time? — all the sums in full, and why $16.93 of cost per item decides what is worth selling
Who can find you
Who can find you
Who can recognise me? — how you get paid can give you away: Venmo shows payments to everyone, and the name on the buyer’s bank statement is your name to the card companies
Sending it
Sending it
What arrives, what gets stopped? — the $6.93 postage that everything you earn is built on top of
Regular buyers
Regular buyers
How do I get one buyer to buy ten times? — the only thing that still works when a site holds your money for 30 days and pays nothing until you hit its minimum
Start
All 19 things people sell
The four questions, 19 kinds of selling, and the whole table
Primary text, verbatim
“We have limited ability to ‘push back.’”
itch.io on itself, 24.07.2025
“Used under garments are prohibited”
CCBill, Exhibit A, “Clothing and Accessories (Used)”
Nothing on their site links to this document. You only reach it through one link buried inside another rule. Read the pages they actually point you at and you never see this ban. And even if it weren’t there, another rule would still stop you: anything second-hand has to be cleaned before posting — which, for worn underwear, destroys the thing the buyer is paying for. (CCBill, Exhibit A and Exhibit B no. 13, reached via AUP clause 4.1.)
“We are not involved in any transactions between users.”
Pantydeal, official FAQ
“Display the merchant’s registered name and full address prominently (no P.O. Box addresses; searchable text format required).”
SegPay, disclosure requirements
Your real name and your home address, in public, as text a search engine can read — and a post-office box is specifically not allowed. So this is where being anonymous ends: on your own shop page, not on the buyer’s bank statement — that part gives nothing away. (SegPay, disclosure requirements.)