195 kinks, and what the platforms actually wrote down. On 6 of every 10 of them, the terms say nothing at all.

This page checks 195 kinks and fetishes against the written rules of OnlyFans, FeetFinder, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, X, PayPal and Visa/Mastercard. Not against what an advice site claims. Against the wording, with the date it was read. Where a platform says nothing, this page says so instead of guessing.

1,185 of 1,950 cells are not addressed: the rules are silent on the practice.

“Not addressed” is a result, not a gap in our work. It does not mean allowed. It means the terms never mention it, the platform decides case by case, and you carry the risk with nothing to go on. Advice sites write “allowed” everywhere, because bans do not bring signups.

60.8 %

of all cells: the platform's own terms do not mention the practice at all.

not addressed1,185

no primary text390

restricted232

allowed90

prohibited53

Reddit names none of the 195 practices. All 195 entries are “not addressed” there — the only column at 100 %. Reddit regulates consent, minors, labelling and legality, never the practice itself. Ask “is X allowed on Reddit?” and the rules give you no answer. Enforcement happens in each subreddit instead.

TikTok bans adult fetish content nowhere. The word “fetish” appears in its guidelines only about minors (“sexualizes or fetishizes a young person's body”). What is banned is nudity, sexual activity and sexual services. “TikTok bans fetish content” is not in the primary text.

On OnlyFans, hypnosis sits in the same sentence as rape and torture. The policy names “hypnosis” verbatim in its prohibited list. Hypno content gets 3,300 searches a month and counts as harmless in the scene. This appears in no guide.

Counted from the 195 rows below, not quoted from anywhere. 195 entries × 10 columns = 1,950 cells. Checked

Every OnlyFans rating on this page is from December 2021.

OnlyFans is the only platform here that names practices in any number — 22 explicit bans. But its Acceptable Use Policy is self-dated December 2021, and we could not reach the live text: the site returned a Cloudflare block, and the domain is blocked at tool level. We did not try to get around either. So the column header reads OF 12/2021 everywhere, and every cell carries the date itself. If OnlyFans has changed the clause since, part of that column is out of date — and we cannot tell you whether it has.

Second limit, just as important: this column is evidence about the Acceptable Use Policy only. Clause 6 of that policy points at separate Community Guidelines, which we could not read either. If those name practices by name, some of the 74 OnlyFans “not addressed” entries here would be wrong.

OnlyFans Acceptable Use Policy, clause 5.2, self-dated December 2021 · read via OpenTermsArchive snapshot, retrieved 14.09.2026. Could not check (2026 text)

Entry

Asking price

Work per item

Posted?

Evidence

Worn panties, 24 h

$25–35 / £20

medium, worn 24 h

yes

Checked

Worn panties, 48 h

$45 / £25

medium, worn 48 h

yes

Checked

Worn panties, 72 h

$60 / £30

medium, worn 72 h

yes

Checked

Worn socks

$25–35 / £15–25

low

yes

Checked

Custom photos

~$7 each · set of 5 ~$30

high, ~1.0 h

Checked

Custom video

~$14/min, $70 minimum

high, ~2.25 h

Checked

Voice / audio

~$6/min

low, ~0.75 h

Checked

Dick rating

$5–25 text · ~$30 video

very low, ~0.25 h

Checked

The other 187 entries

—

Could not check

These three are not a category you can sell. They are criminal offences.

They are here for one reason: each of them can realistically happen to you. In two of the three you are usually the person it is done to — someone reposts your pictures, or builds a fake out of your face. The third starts as a role-play and walks into a criminal offence without anyone deciding to. We give no price, no platform column, no search volume and no description of the act. What it is, why it is a crime, what can happen to you. Nothing else.

Any depiction of a minor — including age-play that depicts one

What it is: Sexual material showing a person under 18. In US federal law a “minor” is any person under the age of eighteen years. The law also covers computer-generated and altered images that cannot be told apart from a real minor.
Why it is a crime: Making it, holding it and passing it on are all criminal offences — in the USA, Germany, the UK, Canada and Australia, in practice everywhere.
What can happen to you: Prosecution and prison. Every platform removes it and reports it. There is no “but they were adults” defence for how it looks: platforms ban depiction as a minor even when everyone involved is an adult.
Where sellers actually walk into it: Age-play and schoolgirl scenarios. They begin as role-play between adults and are legal as such. The risk is that the line is drawn at what the material looks like, not at anyone's real age. German law explicitly reaches material where a person merely appears underage — and how far that reaches is genuinely unsettled. This is the one entry on this page where we tell you to stay well clear of the line rather than near it.

Intimate pictures of someone posted without their consent (NCII, “revenge porn”)

What it is: Intimate or sexually explicit material of a person, published by someone else without that person's agreement.
Why it is a crime: The TAKE IT DOWN Act (May 2025) makes publishing it a federal offence in the USA — and threatening to publish it as well. Germany and the UK have their own provisions. Reddit Rule 3 and the OnlyFans policy both ban it in so many words.
What can happen to you: If you post someone else's: prosecution. If it is done to you: it is a crime committed against you, and since 2025 US platforms must take it down on request. You are the injured party, not someone with a problem to hide.
Why it is on a page for sellers: This is the most common serious thing that happens to people who sell this material. Your pictures get reposted somewhere you never agreed to. A “pay me or it goes public” message is the threat itself, and the threat is already the offence. Keep it, do not pay, report it.

Deepfakes of a real person made without their consent

What it is: Sexual material generated or altered to show a real, identifiable person who never took part in it.
Why it is a crime, and where it is not yet: OnlyFans bans fake or manipulated sexual content, including “deepfakes” outright. In law the picture is patchier and you should know that: several US states criminalise it, and German and EU personality rights reach it — but the federal NO FAKES Act has not been passed, so there is no blanket US protection yet.
What can happen to you: Making one of a real person gets your account closed and can be prosecuted where a law exists. Having one made of you is the more likely direction: your face is public, and that is the raw material. Where there is no criminal law yet, the routes that do work are the platform's own ban and personality rights.

Why these three and nothing else. They are the ones that can actually reach a seller. Two of them are usually done to her. The third is the one people walk into, because it starts as a game. This is not a list of every criminal offence, and it is not meant to be one. It is the short list of what can land on you while you are selling perfectly ordinary things.

18 U.S.C. § 2256 (definition of “minor”) · TAKE IT DOWN Act, May 2025 · OnlyFans AUP clauses 5.2.9 and on deepfakes (12/2021) · Reddit Content Policy Rule 3 · German StGB §§ 184b/184c. Whether German § 184c reaches adults who merely look young is unsettled and we could not resolve it. Checked Could not check (§ 184c reach)

195 kinks, and what the platforms actually wrote down. On 6 of every 10 of them, the terms say nothing at all.

1,185 of 1,950 cells are not addressed: the rules are silent on the practice.

Every OnlyFans rating on this page is from December 2021.

The table: 195 entries against 8 sets of written rules.

What it pays: we have a price for 8 of the 195 entries.

These are asking prices. Nobody measured what was actually paid.

Three things that are crimes, and two of them usually make you the victim.

These three are not a category you can sell. They are criminal offences.

Any depiction of a minor — including age-play that depicts one

Intimate pictures of someone posted without their consent (NCII, “revenge porn”)

Deepfakes of a real person made without their consent

Where this table would lose an argument.

The table is strongest where it shows a ban, weakest where it suggests permission.